1972 Triumph Dolomite 1850

Post pictures and stories about your cars both present and past. Also post up "blogs" on your restoration projects - the more pictures the better! Note: blog-type threads often get few replies, but are often read by many members, and provide interest and motivation to other enthusiasts so don't be disappointed if you don't get many replies.
Message
Author
mach1rob
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:22 pm

Re: 1972 Triumph Dolomite 1850

#281 Post by mach1rob »

Funnily enough, mines pretty much spot on comparing it to GPS data as it stands currently.
vulgalour
Posts: 674
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Re: 1972 Triumph Dolomite 1850

#282 Post by vulgalour »

Did you fit BMW headlights?
mach1rob
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:22 pm

Re: 1972 Triumph Dolomite 1850

#283 Post by mach1rob »

I may have slipped some E30 lights in at some point, yes! ;)
vulgalour
Posts: 674
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Re: 1972 Triumph Dolomite 1850

#284 Post by vulgalour »

I'd been told they drop straight in on most BL twin lamp cars, this is the first time I've seen it done. I was also told you can use Jag twins but they don't quite fit properly. Must be nice being able to see where you're driving.
mach1rob
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:22 pm

Re: 1972 Triumph Dolomite 1850

#285 Post by mach1rob »

Believe me, they don't just slot in! Quite a bit of cutting and trimming is needed for the units to fit into the standard headlamp mounts, the outer dipped units with the projector lenses are extremely deep, and far longer than the headlamp bowl. The inner standard halogen units fit fine however :)

Can't really see from this angle, but the adjusters need to be cut off to fit the existing mounts. I have no idea if the bmw framework would fit making it easier, but I somehow doubt it.

Image

This gives an idea how much longer the units are over standard.
Image
vulgalour
Posts: 674
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Re: 1972 Triumph Dolomite 1850

#286 Post by vulgalour »

I have a feeling that when we measured to get them to fit the Princess, the projector unit fouled the battery so completely I couldn't do it. If I still have the units that were salvaged from the BMW my brother broke I'll have another look at them.
mach1rob
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:22 pm

Re: 1972 Triumph Dolomite 1850

#287 Post by mach1rob »

An quick update on the Tangomite.

I've done sod all to it and it's been stuck in the garage since November. :lol:

I still keep debating whether to swap the auto back to a manual how it should be, or do an MX5 swap to it. Also thinking about changing the interior to black along the way too, but, shock horror, also thought of selling it and flirting with something new.
User avatar
TerryG
Posts: 6757
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 1:54 pm
Location: East Midlands

Re: 1972 Triumph Dolomite 1850

#288 Post by TerryG »

You could always put a v8 in it ;)
Understeer: when you hit the wall with the front of the car.
Oversteer: when you hit the wall with the back of the car.
Horsepower: how fast you hit the wall.
Torque: how far you take the wall with you.
rich.
Posts: 6893
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:18 pm

Re: 1972 Triumph Dolomite 1850

#289 Post by rich. »

or an audi diesel :idea:
User avatar
JPB
Posts: 10319
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:24 pm

Re: 1972 Triumph Dolomite 1850

#290 Post by JPB »

Yep, a nice DOHC Triumph V8 would drop in nicely, or you could go for a crude pushrod device with a Rover label on it..
:scared: ;)
Converting to manual with that diff in the car would make it hellish slow since you'd lose the torque converter advantage, the manuals had a lower 3.63:1 diff (vs 3.27:1 for the auto) which would address this but then it would be fussy at motorway speed and still a little numb compared to the original auto. You'd get decent money for that 3.27 that's in the car though, since it's the correct diff for most GT6s. I'd buy that whole axle back in a flash if I had a Dolly (or 2 litre Ital) in which to fit it. Mmm, Ital..
:drool: :lol:
J
"Home is where you park it", so the saying goes. That may yet come true.. :oops:
Post Reply