Danny Hopkins
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 1:31 pm
On a different thread a while ago I said I felt that over the past few years I thought that PC had lost its way a bit. After reading this issue and the last from cover to cover I would like to point out that I was wrong with regards to how the magazine is now.
Infact I thought the most recent issue was one of the best in a long time with loads of interesting articles and reviews. There is no way a magazine covering cars from the 1930s to the 1990s can only be full of models and marques that everyone agrees with but it was full of interesting articles which is all you can expect. Also the addition of the CM archives is an undoubted sucess.
I stand by my view that in the past PC had lost direction but certainly the recent issues have been faultless and I would catagorically say better value that the rivals.
Danny I would publically like to apologise for any critism that may have been harsh and certainly wasnt a direct attack on you, your talents or your stewardship of the magazine.
I look forward to the next copy.
Matt Cortes.
Infact I thought the most recent issue was one of the best in a long time with loads of interesting articles and reviews. There is no way a magazine covering cars from the 1930s to the 1990s can only be full of models and marques that everyone agrees with but it was full of interesting articles which is all you can expect. Also the addition of the CM archives is an undoubted sucess.
I stand by my view that in the past PC had lost direction but certainly the recent issues have been faultless and I would catagorically say better value that the rivals.
Danny I would publically like to apologise for any critism that may have been harsh and certainly wasnt a direct attack on you, your talents or your stewardship of the magazine.
I look forward to the next copy.
Matt Cortes.
