Raymk wrote:Vulgalour, in your 5-12pm post of yesterday (2nd April) you showed a picture of the rear brake assembly and commented that despite adjustment you did not think they were good enough yet. Now it is entirely possible that I have misinterpretted the photo (old eyes!) and British Leyland may indeed have designed the assembly that way, but one of those linings looks back to front. Usually, to get a slight self servo effect from the lining contact area and pivot geometry, the lining area is arranged to assist in the forward direction (i.e. as a leading shoe). The shoe on the right of the photo should surely have the lining nearest the brake piston. Is this possible from the axle shoe set you started with? No offence will be taken if I'm talking rubbish. Oh, I really enjoy your Princess exploits and I am looking forward to hearing how the Renault shapes up
![]()
Rear brakes should - as Raymk suggested - usually (When the cylinder is a fixed, double ended one as that is then it's almost universally so) have one leading and one trailing shoe to provide sufficient effort for braking when reversing. The rearmost shoe on the backplate shewn seems to have the slot for the end of the parking brake lever at the wrong end and sure enough its lining is leading so perhaps it ought to be the other way up. It's usually harder to get this wrong than to get them right but that certainly could be wrong. I have a manual in my office and am at work on Monday so will look then if nobody steps up before that.