Fair comment, but the CVT version of that car is quicker and more efficient, just as a modern CVT is in more general terms. Accelerating hard as the rev counter reading falls away is a weird experience, but no gears**, hence no gear changes mean that the time spent playing with the gear lever is saved so although I too would love a SuperTurbo, it would need to be a CVT one as that's where the real performance is. That, and the head from a 1 litre one on the 1200 bottom end as the greater amount of metal around the guide bosses in the 1 litre head is the only reason it was chosen as the base for the modifications.TerryG wrote:A supercharger and a turbocharger on the same engine. It has 108hp so I wouldn't have thought anything else the factory offered in a K10 would be quicker. Plus you could uprate both blowers to a modern spec and generate even more power / torque through a wider band.
**- OK, so it has a reverse facility in the final drive, but the primary unit has no gears at all, just magic beans and fairy dust. In an ideal world, all CVTs would be fitted to cars with two stroke engines that could be started Honda-style for reversing.
Rich, I'm off to view it now

It's karma punishing me for scoring that Toyota last year so cheaply and with no faults yet, bar a cracked exhaust manifold which was hardly the end of the world, some 14,000 miles having been covered in it since. Karma dictates that the next ostensibly sound car I buy must be a complete dog which will show its true colours in the first week and fall apart gradually from then on, but that was the Surf, so by that reckoning, the white CVT Micra should be a straight one. I hope it is, because it's 100+ miles away and that's a five gallon, 200+ mile round trip by Toyota.
Wish me luck, eh?
