Thanks Rich, that's actually not a bad idea either, worth considering no doubt!rich. wrote: Wed Feb 07, 2018 5:55 am sis in law has just bought the old "new" beetle convertible she loves that...![]()

Thanks Rich, that's actually not a bad idea either, worth considering no doubt!rich. wrote: Wed Feb 07, 2018 5:55 am sis in law has just bought the old "new" beetle convertible she loves that...![]()
Good point, but I think the Tritec engine used in the Mini is a completely new design, but can't say if they have carried over any design features from the old K series engine...GHT wrote: Wed Feb 07, 2018 1:39 pmRich's comment about the clutch makes me wonder if the engine is the "K" series aberration. The design had strengthening rods going right through the head, the block and into the caps. Made clutch replacement a nightmare, and extremely costly too. Ask any owner of that other BMW model, the MG F. owners of which, found themselves up to £750 out of pocket after a clutch replacement.rich. wrote: Tue Feb 06, 2018 6:57 pm my brother had the clubman thing, expensive pile of poo..paint falling off, 70s bl style then he had a breakdown mechanic look at it again, repaired the problem & when he finished he asked have you changed the clutch yet?? a few days later that went..
good luck![]()
Personally I find the thought of sticking pins in my eyeballs more appealing.
The new Beetle is not a bad idea. Another thought is to remember that if Insurance companies classify a car as classic you can get a very good rate indeed. The way that my 1952 MG is insured is by price agreement. If the car is destroyed or stolen, never to be seen again, my insurers agree to pay me the pre-agreed price that we negotiated. In the case of my car, that's £25K. My premiums are £117 per year, for my wife and I, with unlimited mileage. Keeping it in a heated, lock up garage, probably influences that price.
Thanks for your suggestion, GHT. It's a little easier to get into classic car ownership here in Ireland as the car only needs to be 30 years old when it also qualifies for 56 euro annual motor tax, although any car registered after 1.1.1980 will need an annual NCT (=MOT). However, the motor tax is based on engine volume for cars older than 2009, so for example a 2-litre car will cost 710 euro a year to tax. A 1-litre engine is by comparison 199 euro per year. This applies as long as the car isn't yet 30 years old. Then again the selection of cars is obviously fantastically better in the UK....GHT wrote: Wed Feb 07, 2018 2:59 pmThe new Beetle is not a bad idea. Another thought is to remember that if Insurance companies classify a car as classic you can get a very good rate indeed. The way that my 1952 MG is insured is by price agreement. If the car is destroyed or stolen, never to be seen again, my insurers agree to pay me the pre-agreed price that we negotiated. In the case of my car, that's £25K. My premiums are £117 per year, for my wife and I, with unlimited mileage. Keeping it in a heated, lock up garage, probably influences that price.
A 1952 car is not really practical for your requirement, but I do know that the Mk2 Golf now has classic status, and with the Mk1 fetching absolutely silly prices these days, the Mk2 might be worth a look. Just to digress a little, my missus drives a Mk3 Golf that she has had for almost 20 years. It's a 1998 model and has shared that heated garage with the MG, making it a really good buy for someone, if we were selling it, but we are not. I only mention that because if you are patient you might find a similarly well kept car.
As well as low cost insurance, the nearer you get to a forty-year-old car, the nearer you are to being tax and MOT free, although I would strongly advise a voluntary MOT.
So if you found yourself a sound, but tatty, rubber bumpered MGB GT, circa 1978, for a low price, you could spend a few quid restoring it and replacing those awful bumpers with a chrome grille and have yourself a decent car, with low insurance, no tax and just about every conceivable spare part available. It's worth thinking about.
Thank you!GHT wrote: Wed Feb 07, 2018 6:07 pm Have a look at this.
Or, if you can spare the time, scroll down this lot and see the entire program.
I have heard it said that the Issigonis Mini had more space inside, despite being much smaller.Luxobarge wrote: Tue Feb 06, 2018 7:22 pm Huge on the outside, tiny and cramped on the inside, especially the back seats (virtually useless) and a microscopic boot.