77 TR7
Re: 77 TR7
I agree, the one I ended up with in a deal was far worse than made out on closer inspection, and would have cost far more to make into a nice car again that it was worth, so I ended up breaking it for bits, and got a reasonable return on it.motman wrote:You can get an MGF for a few hundred pounds now but they are usually very rough and will cost far more than they will ever be worth to put right. Much better to spend more and get a good one
Being a 1.8 VVC it went like stink and was a hoot to drive though.
Re: 77 TR7
It was a 10ft car, looked good from 10 ft away and in the pics, but screen surround was full of rust, front screen had a crack, rear screen was torn, inside was full of water, exhaust was rotten, rusty spots all over, alternator needed replacement, so by the time you'd have sorted that, not worth it when you can get a good one for 750-1000.
Re: 77 TR7
There is nothing wrong with liking the MG-F.
Understeer: when you hit the wall with the front of the car.
Oversteer: when you hit the wall with the back of the car.
Horsepower: how fast you hit the wall.
Torque: how far you take the wall with you.
Oversteer: when you hit the wall with the back of the car.
Horsepower: how fast you hit the wall.
Torque: how far you take the wall with you.
Re: 77 TR7
thanks mate, its taken me a while to come out....TerryG wrote:There is nothing wrong with liking the MG-F.
-
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:09 pm
Re: 77 TR7
I liked those stripes on the TR7 - they gave definition to a side view that is now rather slab-like
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests