cellulose paint spraying

Post your technical queries / problems here!
Message
Author
suffolkpete
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:54 am

Re: cellulose paint spraying

#11 Post by suffolkpete » Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:00 pm

mr rusty wrote: It's main benefit is that it's initial drying is so quick, it keeps the dead bugs to a minimum.
It's also easier to fix defects if you put enough on. I had an email exchange with Fuzz last year about featuring cellulose painting in PC and this is his reply:
"The use of cellulose is questionable.
Personally, I’ve seen many problems with it, from initial application, to bloom and huge problems when the next repaint occurs.
As a result, I prefer not to recommend it."
1974 Rover 2200 SC
1982 Matra Murena 1.6

tractorman
Posts: 1399
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:22 am
Location: Wigton, Cumbria

Re: cellulose paint spraying

#12 Post by tractorman » Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:40 pm

The only problem I have with 2Pak is that my garage is attached to our house (with various doors, windows and vents through). Actually there are two problems - the next door neighbour's garage shares a common wall and we get his volatile compound smell in our garage (fair exchange!). As his garage is mirror image to ours, it vents into his house too! I would not be popular if I poisoned my mother or, more importantly to some, my neighbours!

OK, I read modern 2pak isn't supposed to be toxic - I was told something similar about twenty years ago by a friend who was a paint sprayer. Unfortunately, he is no longer with us - he died of a heart attack in his early forties.

My main moan with 2Pak is that as soon as the laquer has chipped, water gets behind and causes problems. A friend has just had to have the wheel arches and sills sorted on his 2008 Focus, so I fear this is still a problem!

Luckily (or not) I can't get celly for the car (silver metallic) and the tractors are sprayed with traditional synthetic enamel (though some perfer to spoil the originality of their tractors and use 2Pak), so I think I can say I'm an impartial observer!

mr rusty
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 10:17 am
Location: Harlow, the birthplace of fibreoptic communication, as the town sign says.

Re: cellulose paint spraying

#13 Post by mr rusty » Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:05 pm

It's also easier to fix defects if you put enough on. I had an email exchange with Fuzz last year about featuring cellulose painting in PC and this is his reply:
"The use of cellulose is questionable.
Personally, I’ve seen many problems with it, from initial application, to bloom and huge problems when the next repaint occurs.
As a result, I prefer not to recommend it."
Not very practical from Fuzz there! We don't all have paint booths, I've never even had a garage!

Bloom is dealt with by waiting until the weather is warm and/or using anti-bloom thinner, and why did he think rthere'd be huge problems with the next respray? I can understand celly reacting with old paint, that's why we have isolator, but what causes trouble on top of cellulose that isolator again wouldn't deal with?

If you're painting on the drive or in the garden cellulose is really the only option- two pack might or might not kill you in a russian roullette sort of way, coachpaint takes absolutely for ever to dry, and I know absolutely sod all about how to use water based paints, so cellulose it is for me every time until something better for home use comes along.
1968 Triumph Vitesse Mk1 2 litre convertible, Junior Miss rusty has a 1989 998cc Mk2 Metro, Mrs Rusty has a modern common rail diesel thing.

m.thaddeus
Posts: 120
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 2:49 pm

Re: cellulose paint spraying

#14 Post by m.thaddeus » Mon Mar 28, 2011 7:24 pm

Hello again

The issue with painting over Celly is that the thinners will soften the old paint and make it prone to sinkage or ringing-up around the edge of any repair.
Barrier coats are traditionally made of old fashioned oil based paints, which are thick and must not be flatted through.

Back in the 80's and before, when faced with a panel which had been painted in Celly to repair, the thing to do was to remove all and any paint from the repair area and to fill only direct onto bare metal. This demanded that a lot of time was spent and a huge of acreage of primer used when compared to repairs on modern more stable paints.

I have a 67 Alfa Guilietta respray coming up, it is in Cellulose and I will give the whole thing a continuous coat of 2k hi-build primer, followed by a goodly squirt of 2k to top. I will be working in a cowshed with water on the floor to keep the dust down.

The best barrier coat that I know of for problem surfaces which might otherwise pickle is 2k Clearcoat with no added thinners. Because this is a high/medium solids material with little or no solvent it provides a good surface finish without the risk.

User avatar
Grumpy Northener
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 8:26 am
Location: Hampshire UK

Re: cellulose paint spraying

#15 Post by Grumpy Northener » Sun Apr 03, 2011 8:42 am

In March & April of last year through temps of 5 degrees - I painted the panels of a 1950's Jowett Jupiter, in a dusty shack of a workshop - the celly paint was left for a few months before we touched it although the car was in use - through the summer each panel was flatted back with soap & 1500's prior to compound / T cut & waxing - taking several hours on each panel - all panels had been bare metaled - the paint was 32 years old !!!! with the pigment all in the bottom of the tins - we had to scrape it all out and paddle mix it in one batch for hours - the spray gun was a £32 gravity fed gun - End result: Winner of the 2010 Classic Car of the Year at the NEC in Birmingham - leave the modern paints for the modern cars and stick to cellulose for the classics - it is harder work - but a period feel and finish can be obtained and any mistake is easy to correct.
1937 Jowett 8 - Project - in less pieces than the Jupiter
1943 Jowett Stationary Engine
1952 Jowett Jupiter - In lots of peices http://Jowett.org/
1952 Jowett Javelin - Largely original
1973 Rover P6 V8 - Original / 22,000 miles

User avatar
JPB
Posts: 10319
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:24 pm

Re: cellulose paint spraying

#16 Post by JPB » Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:03 am

Interesting comments there, given that very few cars built since the '60s would have been painted in cellulose on the line.
Your '54 Jupiter, on the other hand, would most likely have been finished in enamel unless it was one of the metallics. A friend who's been a Jowett car club member since the '70s reckons that enamel was used on the Briggs bodies and when he tried to paint his Jupiter in cellulose, the underlying enamel reacted and off it all had to come. Those were the solid shades, he reckoned that the metallics (and all in-house bodies) were in cellulose. Well done on what has to be the ultimate bit of proactive recycling; most would have left that old paint well alone. :)
J
"Home is where you park it", so the saying goes. That may yet come true.. :oops:

User avatar
Grumpy Northener
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 8:26 am
Location: Hampshire UK

Re: cellulose paint spraying

#17 Post by Grumpy Northener » Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:33 am

John - The Jowett Javelin was Briggs bodied and enamel painted, but the Jupiter was in house built and panelled by Jowett, the restoration was to bare metal so no reaction to the paint was encounted. We have just commenced a total restoration on a very historic Javelin as our next restoration - cellulose will be used again - it is just such a forgiving paint when comes to mistakes (not that we try to make too many) - will post pics once we get mounted to the car turner.
1937 Jowett 8 - Project - in less pieces than the Jupiter
1943 Jowett Stationary Engine
1952 Jowett Jupiter - In lots of peices http://Jowett.org/
1952 Jowett Javelin - Largely original
1973 Rover P6 V8 - Original / 22,000 miles

User avatar
JPB
Posts: 10319
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:24 pm

Re: cellulose paint spraying

#18 Post by JPB » Sun Apr 03, 2011 12:02 pm

Excellent. Any excuse to post pictures of Jowetts is a good excuse. :D

Now I'm off to tell Duncan that he was wrong about which bodies were in-house and which were Briggs', maybe I'll even have a little gloat about it. ;)
J
"Home is where you park it", so the saying goes. That may yet come true.. :oops:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 101 guests