december issue
Re: december issue
Its a bit odd to say the least re the article in the letters pages about Mr Greg Barnes's Mini, and his difficulty in trying to sort out the problem about someone trying to register the car again after it was stolen. I understand that the DVLA over there write to the previous owner if someone is attempting to re register a vehicle thats already registered.I would have thought that since they know that it has an existing owner,that the attempt to do so again is fraudulent.So why did they do it then? There is something missing here.
Re: december issue
i thought that all the new controls with the v5 etc were to stamp out all that. as far as i can see its a system to screw money out of decent people & the police are just being lazy, as a real case would be complicated..sounds like the pc granada all over again..
Re: december issue
No, there's not. The registered keeper isn't legally required to be the owner of a vehicle in the UK, see THESE THREADS.Oldcarnut wrote:Its a bit odd to say the least re the article in the letters pages about Mr Greg Barnes's Mini, and his difficulty in trying to sort out the problem about someone trying to register the car again after it was stolen. I understand that the DVLA over there write to the previous owner if someone is attempting to re register a vehicle thats already registered.I would have thought that since they know that it has an existing owner,that the attempt to do so again is fraudulent.So why did they do it then? There is something missing here.
J
"Home is where you park it", so the saying goes. That may yet come true..
"Home is where you park it", so the saying goes. That may yet come true..
Re: december issue
December issue finally reached SW France.
I think your attempt to establish the remaining number of 'Mark' Jaguars is doomed and not just because PC still insists there is no difference between a Mk10/420G and a 420. Put them beside each other if you still don't believe it! A Mk10/420G is a Mk10 and a 420 is a Mk2. Also, I reckon it must be impossible to track the number of Mk2 2.4s that have vanished, then re-appeared as tarted-up 3.8s thanks to the likes of Vicarage, etc. And what about Daimler 2.5s? Nicest Mk2 in my opinion but I reckon a lot of them went the same way. But surely they should be counted as Mk2s one way or another?
I was also interested to see the advice to road test and fine tune against pinking was illustrated with a Wartburg 312. I think the person who can stop a 311/312 or a 353 (Knight) pinking is not yet born!
I think your attempt to establish the remaining number of 'Mark' Jaguars is doomed and not just because PC still insists there is no difference between a Mk10/420G and a 420. Put them beside each other if you still don't believe it! A Mk10/420G is a Mk10 and a 420 is a Mk2. Also, I reckon it must be impossible to track the number of Mk2 2.4s that have vanished, then re-appeared as tarted-up 3.8s thanks to the likes of Vicarage, etc. And what about Daimler 2.5s? Nicest Mk2 in my opinion but I reckon a lot of them went the same way. But surely they should be counted as Mk2s one way or another?
I was also interested to see the advice to road test and fine tune against pinking was illustrated with a Wartburg 312. I think the person who can stop a 311/312 or a 353 (Knight) pinking is not yet born!
Re: december issue
how did I miss those two threads? I should have dug more on the searching, thanks JPB.It seems bonkers about some ones name can be on the V5 form but still not the registered owner .I thought our system was silly, but the person on our VLC (equivalent of your V5) is the registered owner.
Re: december issue
The issue with John Simpson's Alpine and the engine having been ruined, would the facility that performed the testing not be liable for the costs of the repairs? Or did you sign a form to exempt them from this?
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:01 am
Re: december issue
Seems odd to rebuild all those cars over the winter for the condition 1 values to be the same as condition 3!
Matt
1962 Triumph Herald 1200 Coupe
1970 Triumph Herald 1360 Convertible
1978 Reliant Scimitar SS1
1986 Mini City
1990 Mini Equinox
1969 Hillman Imp
1969 Morris Minor 1000
Scarab Formula Vee race car
5x racing karts, Rotax, pro, 100cc and gearbox.
1962 Triumph Herald 1200 Coupe
1970 Triumph Herald 1360 Convertible
1978 Reliant Scimitar SS1
1986 Mini City
1990 Mini Equinox
1969 Hillman Imp
1969 Morris Minor 1000
Scarab Formula Vee race car
5x racing karts, Rotax, pro, 100cc and gearbox.
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:35 pm
Re: december issue
Finally picked up a copy over the weekend.
A great edition in the main. Nice to see the 4-cyl Rover P6 engine getting some column inches.
But the back page stuff about Porsches and Ferraris is a big turn-off for me, is he wishing he was working for a different magazine or something?
A great edition in the main. Nice to see the 4-cyl Rover P6 engine getting some column inches.
But the back page stuff about Porsches and Ferraris is a big turn-off for me, is he wishing he was working for a different magazine or something?
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 1:14 pm
Re: december issue
I had to sign a disclaimer saying I would not hold them responsible for damage to engine Lesson now learnt and I shall only take to someone who is sympathetic to older cars, i.e. don't get in it and take it up to 7000rpm!! muppetsOldcarnut wrote:The issue with John Simpson's Alpine and the engine having been ruined, would the facility that performed the testing not be liable for the costs of the repairs? Or did you sign a form to exempt them from this?
John Simpson
1964 Sunbeam Rapier IV
1966 Sunbeam Alpine V GT
1981 Mini City
1983 MG Metro
1997 MGF
2003 MG ZS
2004 MG ZT T
1966 Sunbeam Alpine V GT
1981 Mini City
1983 MG Metro
1997 MGF
2003 MG ZS
2004 MG ZT T
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests