New austin allegro forum

Got something to say, but it's not classic related? Here's the place to discuss. Also includes the once ever-so-popular word association thread... (although we've had to start from scratch with it - sorry!)
Message
Author
hillmanimpman
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:26 pm

New austin allegro forum

#1 Post by hillmanimpman » Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:32 pm

hi everyone i have started a new forum for the austin allegro because the club one doen't let non-members onto there forum.
if you own an allegro please show your support also i require mods/admins to help me develop the site if can help please send me a message here or contact me on the forum.
hope to see you there :D
http://austinallegro.forumotion.co.uk/
1976 Morris Marina
1975 Austin Allegrohttp://austinallegro.forumotion.co.uk/
1972 Ford Escort Mk1 1100L needs work
1971 Hillman Imp Van,moving very slowly
1956 James Cadet 175cc http://www.famousjamesmotorcycleclub@webs.com

User avatar
TriumphDriver
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:48 pm

Re: New austin allegro forum

#2 Post by TriumphDriver » Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:44 pm

I see even Allegros aren't immune. They're discussing putting an A-series turbo engine into an Allegro?
I like period mods or even a similar but more powerful engine eg Triumph 1500 into a 1200, but why oh why do some people think that old car + old engine - ANY old engine - is an improvement or even desireable?
I like Allegros, the discussion on the Quartic steering wheel confirms what I always believed - people are actively seeking them to retro-fit. Maybe in a few years, owners will be trying to source the original engine for their car, or an original gearbox they threw away for a Type 9? Or will they just dump them as uneconomic?
My posts are for debate and discussion, I'm not The Oracle!

User avatar
M Paul Lloyd
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:46 am
Location: Northumberland
Contact:

Re: New austin allegro forum

#3 Post by M Paul Lloyd » Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:45 pm

I had a 1750 HL in a sort of sand/green colour with a dirt brown vinyl roof, mustard velour and a round steering wheel (no quadratic eccentricty for me Lol) with a dash that matched the roof mmmm....... lovely. :?
Anyway it was a brilliant car, its only drawback was the slightly silly little boot.
Now if it had been a hatchback........ :ugeek:
May the light at the end of your long dark tunnel not be a train travelling the other way.
http://sciencefocus.com/forum/index.php ... e0b9d88e25

User avatar
TriumphDriver
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:48 pm

Re: New austin allegro forum

#4 Post by TriumphDriver » Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:27 am

M Paul Lloyd wrote: Now if it had been a hatchback........ :ugeek:
The Allegro estate was a good car, very practical as a cheap load-carrier.
My posts are for debate and discussion, I'm not The Oracle!

User avatar
JPB
Posts: 10319
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:24 pm

Re: New austin allegro forum

#5 Post by JPB » Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:17 am

... and an excellent source of those odd-shaped rear side windows for kitten owners who want glass ones in their cars. ;)

In serious mode though, on the Allegro wagon; why does it rot so spectacularly when Allegro saloons seem, if anything, far less prone than most of their contemporaries?
I'd join and ask the question there but couldn't understand the default language at the forum when I had a look. :roll:
J
"Home is where you park it", so the saying goes. That may yet come true.. :oops:

Aar0sc
Posts: 272
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:16 pm

Re: New austin allegro forum

#6 Post by Aar0sc » Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:16 pm

JPB wrote:I'd join and ask the question there but couldn't understand the default language at the forum when I had a look. :roll:
:lol:

It just needs a bit of punctuation and Capital Letters at the Start of Sentances - it'd probably make a lot more sense then.

That or its in Welsh...
1977 Triumph Spitfire 1500; 1974 Jaguar E-Type OTS V12

User avatar
Luxobarge
Posts: 1900
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:12 pm
Location: Horne, Surreyshire

Re: New austin allegro forum

#7 Post by Luxobarge » Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:22 pm

Aar0sc wrote:[It just needs a bit of punctuation and Capital Letters at the Start of Sentences ...
And spelling (corrected your post for you BTW) and grammar, and vocabulary and sentence construction......
Some people are like Slinkies - they serve no useful purpose, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them downstairs.

mr rusty
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 10:17 am
Location: Harlow, the birthplace of fibreoptic communication, as the town sign says.

Re: New austin allegro forum

#8 Post by mr rusty » Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:31 pm

The Allegro estate was a good car, very practical as a cheap load-carrier.
.........I would disagree with that! They were terrible as load carriers which is probably why so few Allegro or ADO16 estates survive now, and probably why BL never considered a commercial version. There were Marina vans, Minor vans, A35 vans, etc, but never an Allegro van.

What made the saloon version ride a million times better than a cart sprung Ford Escort or Vauxhall Viva was it's hydragas, unfortunately however when you load the back of an estate up with heavy stuff it shoves all the fluid to the front end and makes it point seiously skywards- not a problem in a hydropneumatic Citroen because the height corrector levels off the back end to compensate, but a bit of a problem with hydragas.
1968 Triumph Vitesse Mk1 2 litre convertible, Junior Miss rusty has a 1989 998cc Mk2 Metro, Mrs Rusty has a modern common rail diesel thing.

User avatar
TriumphDriver
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:48 pm

Re: New austin allegro forum

#9 Post by TriumphDriver » Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:34 pm

I wasn't thinking industrial strength; just a few light but bulky objects that wouldn't fit in the saloon boot...
My posts are for debate and discussion, I'm not The Oracle!

User avatar
M Paul Lloyd
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:46 am
Location: Northumberland
Contact:

Re: New austin allegro forum

#10 Post by M Paul Lloyd » Sun Feb 27, 2011 7:05 pm

Ah yes the squashy hydrogas suspension, both its greatest asset............... and weakness. :?
As for rust I seem to recall wheel arches, sills and floor went in very Mini-like fashion. I got to compare mine with a slightly older SAAB which for all intents and purposes looked as good as new.
I rest my case about the hatch idea though ;) but would also like to add that they would have sold a lot more to German customers if British Leyland had exported the 1750 version rather than the 1500, with its fifth gear and higher bhp it was perfect for autobahn motoring.

Oh for a time machine. :roll:
May the light at the end of your long dark tunnel not be a train travelling the other way.
http://sciencefocus.com/forum/index.php ... e0b9d88e25

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 127 guests