Practically Classics Forum

JPB wrote: ↑

Thu Jul 20, 2017 5:58 pm

Mmm, on that arsebook page: A grey Carina auto from a 1980s year. Too damned low but I know someone who's looking so TVM for posting.


thats the one i tried to post



Oh, and on the Vauxhall; how am I able to see pictures of it if it never was?

something to do with time travel again john??

That must be it. I've attempted time travel but the closest I came to success involved my losing a watch by leaving it on a night bus in Leeds during my time as a student there. Some kindly soul found the watch and handed it in at the bus depot and, when I called there a week or so later* to ask whether they'd had the watch put in to the lost property office (*couldn't be more precise, I'd lost my watch..), the time displayed was some ten minutes adrift of the actual time by the bus company's large wall clock. I like to think that time travelled a little, probably only from the Headrow to Chapeltown but hey, it's a start.

is that why they didn't pick you for the new dr who....

Nah, that's because I'm male, don't have a history of flashing my buttocks all over the internet and am known for being shy around Daleks. I'm sure that the new Dr Who will be perfect for the job, but can't help thinking that Anna Friel would have been the better choice!

Here's that new Who, pictured on the web, presumably during the filming of her first episode:



I'll be watching.

linky no worky.. im not sure if thats a bad thing...

Oops! It was work safe, but I took the lazy option and hotlinked to it, an action rewarded by the image's owner replacing it with the link that eventually appeared.
The actual image was a very tasteful head & shoulders shot of Jodie "Dr Who" Whittaker, which extended only as far downwards as the pink bits above the greasing points on her kingpins, nothing more risqué I promise!

By way of compensation, here's another, hosted at my Photobucket page. This one was a bit cheeky, so Rupert Murdoch's face has been used to hide Dr Who's rear aspect, it's uncanny how little difference this makes to the image, thanks to Rupert for this:

JPB wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:36 pm

Nah, that's because I'm male, don't have a history of flashing my buttocks all over the internet

PORKIES! That last picture you posted was from your Photobucket account, I'm afraid the image has kicked the bucket, Photobucket doesn't want to play anymore.

Apologies for the attempted use of humour relating to the poor saps who upgraded their perfectly functional bhotopucket accounts to ad-free, only to find that they'd also lost their upload allowance unless they paid some money to the chiselling twunts to allow the service to continue for them, here's the actual image:




GHT, I hope the payout from the bet was sufficiently high for the embarrassment involved in posing for that skimpy shorts image, now please may I borrow some of your eye bleach?

ok, now ive broken photobucket what other free sites are available that are suitable & me proof.. poor old terry wore himself out teaching me to post my pics.. is that why he has been quiet lately or is he trapped in his golf?

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1997-VOLVO-96 ... 3641.l6368

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/like/20199480 ... rmvSB=true

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1972-MORRIS-M ... 2253334997