No, I am not blind- is that some weak attempt at an insult??Luxobarge wrote:Are you blind?Morrisand944S2man wrote:Sorry, Luxo, but you don't know what you are talking about as regards the Porsche 944!
I made the word "Opinion" as easy to see as possible, yet you still seem to have missed it.
It's my opinion, not a fact, just an opinion, and as such cannot be said to be wrong. I find your attitude quite insulting, please do not tell people they "don't know what they are talking about" when they express an opinion.
You would do well and gain more friends on here if you expressed your opinions as such, and not constantly force them down our throats as facts. They are not facts, they are your opinions, and as such are therefore as worthless as mine or anybody else's on here. In your opinion the 944 is a great car. In mine it's not. Live with it!
Yes, you have an "opinion" which you are welcome to, but in the case of the Porsche 944 it is clearly an incorrect opinion. Therefore, you are mis-informed. I have owned a 944 S2 for over 15 years and I know a lot about these cars. All "opinions" are NOT equally valid!! Some are based on knowledge and experience and some based on what the opinion holder "read in a magazine". Clearly the person who has direct knowledge and experience of a subject has a valid "opinion" and the person who's "opinion" is based on heresay and second hand knowledge does not. Informed "opinion" IS fact, mis-informed "opinion" is just plain wrong!!
My "opinions" are shared by many other people (who also long ago stopped buying PC magazine, and are based on good information and knowledge and experience. I have thought long and hard about this.
BTW, I didn't come here to "make friends", I came here to voice my views (and the views of many others!) on the Practical Classics forum in the hope that the magazine might take note as to how to improve their magazine and thereby halt the decline in sales.